Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt


from the look-who’s-conversing dept

This 7 days, our to start with position winner on the insightful side is an anonymous remark about publishers professing that their lawsuit versus the World-wide-web Archive won’t effects any of its solutions past the Open up Library:

About as believable as Putin’s assert tat 96% of people polled desired to develop into Russians.

In 2nd spot, it’s a lengthy comment from Rico R. responding to an try to protect the court docket ruling that claims YouTube ripping instruments may perhaps violate copyright:

A handful of challenges with your tried distinctions, position for level:

1) youtube’s look at webpage is performing just how google developed their net website to do the job.

Can’t disagree there.

2) youtube-dl on the other hand, does one thing that youtube’s terms of service are explicitly forbidding, i.e. shifting the movies outdoors of youtube platform

Yes, YouTube’s phrases of provider prohibit downloading YouTube movies. But that doesn’t make it an inherent copyright violation, be it infringement or circumventing technological security steps.

3) The purpose for the TOS forbid is simply because google has only necessary online video authors to give a license to use the videos in just the youtube process. Video clip authors do not need to have to give any far more adaptable licenses to google than whatever the add button paperwork necessitates. So taking video clips outside of youtube platform is unlawful, simply because google does not have authorization to do it. If google does not have permission to do it, then youtube’s stop consumers never have the permission possibly.

Uh, no. YouTube’s terms of support presents Google a license to the content material uploaded to their platform, but that does not signify it is copyright infringement if a third social gathering (i.e., a person employing youtube-dl and Isn’t Google) downloads it. In reality, YouTube has an possibility that allows you to release your YouTube movie less than a Artistic Commons-Attribution license. Not the default selection, I know, but even the CC BY films selected as such on YouTube do not have a down load button that enables the very same operation as youtube-dl. Employing youtube-dl or any other instrument to down load these videos is permitted beneath these conditions. And if YouTube says its TOS however trumps the conditions of the Artistic Commons license, then THEY are breaking the license terms. Less than the logic of this lawsuit, YouTube is including a TPM to CC-licnesed video clips uploaded to their platform, and CC licensees might NOT incorporate TPMs according to the license conditions.

But still, let’s say we’re conversing about the larger sized subset of YouTube movies underneath the “Standard YouTube License.” Google has a license to the material when people publish their films on YouTube. The TOS covers what they can and cannot do with that information. But whichever rights Google could have does not influence no matter whether or not a 3rd occasion can down load the movie without the need of infringing copyright. Don’t forget, breaking YouTube’s phrases of support does not quickly make it copyright infringement. At most, it’s a agreement violation among Google and the close user who downloaded the material.

4) there is option that consumers who want to download the movies from youtube, will individually talk to for permission from the video authors. Sad to say, the call addresses are normally not out there for movies, so facet-channel permission requests are generally failing in youtube platform.

This logic assumes the only way you can lawfully down load a YouTube video clip (assuming you are not breaking the TOS or the so-called “TPM”) needs permission from the video’s uploader/creator. But there’s many non-infringing good reasons to obtain YouTube video clips. Perhpas to down load the movie to view later on (time-shifting). Or potentially you have a gradual Broadband link anywhere you reside, and you want to check out the YouTube video clip in the highest possible excellent without having interruption. Or perhaps you want to listen to a YouTube video’s audio on the go with no exhibiting the video. Or probably you want to make a good use of the video’s articles. None of these require permission from the creator. And if you required to use the material in a way that expected authorization, there’s no cause why you need to have to also question the video’s creator to send out a copy of the movie to them. The actuality that YouTube doesn’t deliver an simple way to get hold of any consumer privately is irrelevant to this discussion.

For editor’s preference on the insightful side, we start out with a comment from Stephen T. Stone about The Onion’s superb amicus brief:

When The Onion is crafting far better authorized briefs about no cost speech than the sorts of men and women who assert to be “defenders of absolutely free speech“…well, which is a tale you may possibly essentially read through in The Onion.

Subsequent, it’s a comment from Toom1275 about 1 of the right’s beloved words and phrases:

In contemporary usage, “Woke” signifies “Not an irredeemable piece of shit, as opposed to the a single making use of the time period as a pejorative.”

About on the funny aspect, our 1st spot winner is Anonymous Hero with a remark about Elon Musk’s texts:

My beloved excerpt: “I have an plan for a blockchain social media system that does the two payments and quick text messages/hyperlinks like twitter … The next piece of the puzzle is a huge real-time databases that keeps a copy of all blockchain messages in memory”

Can you consider it? A huge databases! Of the block chain! In memory!

In 2nd position, it is BvR with a comment about Republicans:

The GQP normally complains that government doesn’t work.

Then, when they get voted in, they establish it.

For editor’s preference on the humorous aspect, we begin out with a comment from glenn about OAN’s attempt to survive by applying more than-the-air antennas:

OAN: so worthless that they just can’t give it away.

Last but not least, it is a straightforward anonymous remark about Laura Loomer’s most recent authorized reduction:

Alright, Loomer.

Which is all for this week, individuals!

Leave a Reply